Hello,
I have a list of dicts, and I would like to add a (key, value) pair to each dict (ie. to each element of the list).
Typically, I have this list:
- port: 2000
release: trusty
- port: 2001
release: xenial
And I would like to create this one
- port: 2000
release: trusty
name: trusty-2000
- port: 2001
release: xenial
name: xenial-2001
Is it possible? I tried using the “map(‘combine’)” filter (see below) but do see how to compute a different value for each element.
This is probably something obvious that I’m missing.
Thank you!
$ cat list.yaml
- hosts: localhost
vars:
- containers:
- port: 2000
release: trusty
- port: 2001
release: xenial
- containers_with_name: “{{ containers | map(‘combine’, {‘name’: ‘TODO:release-port’ }) | list }}”
tasks:
- debug:
msg: “containers_with_name: {{ containers_with_name }}”
$ ansible-playbook list.yaml
[WARNING]: provided hosts list is empty, only localhost is available
PLAY [localhost] ***************************************************************
TASK [setup] *******************************************************************
ok: [localhost]
TASK [debug] *******************************************************************
ok: [localhost] => {
“msg”: “containers_with_name: [{u’release’: u’trusty’, u’port’: 2000, ‘name’: ‘TODO:release-port’}, {u’release’: u’xenial’, u’port’: 2001, ‘name’: ‘TODO:release-port’}]”
}
PLAY RECAP *********************************************************************
localhost : ok=2 changed=0 unreachable=0 failed=0
Try this. Its not exactly pretty, but it seems to do what you need.
$ cat listtest-playbook.yml
Hello,
thank you for your answer, and sorry for my late one.
Try this. Its not exactly pretty,
indeed data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b17b8/b17b86088947fd71f24c0d28af05237021c2fc39" alt=":frowning: :frowning:"
I’m growing increasingly frustrated by the many quirks and lack of expressibility of ansible’s dialect .
This would have been peanuts to write in python. I probably investigate how to write python module/filters in order to avoid jinja-ed yaml.
but it seems to do what you need.
Yes, thank you.
For my real use-case, I ended-up using with_subelements (see below), but I’ll recall how you use set_fact.
$ cat hosts
[jenkins_masters]
ald-1545-de
[jenkins_slaves_holders]
ald-1545-de
ald-1469-de
[jenkins_slaves_holders:vars]
jenkins_slaves=[{‘release’: ‘trusty’, ‘ssh_port’: 2000},{‘release’: ‘xenial’, ‘ssh_port’: 2001}]
$ cat main.yaml
let ansible know about each created container
add_host “bypasses the play host loop”: it will only be called from one host.
Let this host be “localhost”, for symmetry.
- hosts: localhost
tasks:
- add_host:
hostname: “{{ item.0.inventory_hostname_short }}-build-{{ item.1.release }}”
container_holder_inventory_hostname_short: “{{ item.0.inventory_hostname_short }}”
ansible_port: “{{ item.1.ssh_port }}”
ansible_host: “{{ item.0.ansible_host }}”
ansible_user: ‘root’
jenkins_master: “{{ groups[‘jenkins_masters’] | first | mandatory }}”
groups: ‘build,jenkinsslaves’
with_subelements:
- “{{ groups[‘jenkins_slaves_holders’] | map(‘extract’, hostvars) | list }}”
- jenkins_slaves
Thank you again!