# Packagers: Packaging changes may be required for 1.2

**URL:** <https://forum.ansible.com/t/packagers-packaging-changes-may-be-required-for-1-2/12738>\
**Category:** Ansible Project\
**Created:** [April 29, 2013, 11:11pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/packagers-packaging-changes-may-be-required-for-1-2/12738 "2013-04-29T23:11:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael\_DeHaan2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/da6949/32.png) [@Michael\_DeHaan2](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Michael_DeHaan2)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2013, 11:11pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/packagers-packaging-changes-may-be-required-for-1-2/12738/1 "2013-04-29T23:11:04Z")

</div>

Note that per my previous email library files are now stored in the main tree under subdirectories.

It seems at least the RPM needs to be updated to handle this, though likely other packaging (BSD, macports, Debian, etc) need to be as well.

I’m open to pull requests on all of these and wanted to let everyone know that if you are maintaining packages there is a new structure to the library directory packages will need to accommodate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jimmy\_Tang](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ac91a4/32.png) [@Jimmy\_Tang](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Jimmy_Tang)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2013, 6:49am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/packagers-packaging-changes-may-be-required-for-1-2/12738/2 "2013-04-30T06:49:03Z")

</div>

FYI, the macports package in the repo seems to work fine – [http://pastebin.com/xWiHYexk](http://pastebin.com/xWiHYexk) I’ve just reinstalled the development version.

Jimmy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dennis\_Jacobfeuerbor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/58f4c7/32.png) [@Dennis\_Jacobfeuerbor](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Dennis_Jacobfeuerbor)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2013, 11:04am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/packagers-packaging-changes-may-be-required-for-1-2/12738/3 "2013-04-30T11:04:00Z")

</div>

RPM packages build seem to be ok too. “make rpm” built the rpm without problems and after the installation ansible works as expected.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael\_DeHaan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c4cdca/32.png) [@Michael\_DeHaan](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Michael_DeHaan)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2013, 12:22pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/packagers-packaging-changes-may-be-required-for-1-2/12738/4 "2013-04-30T12:22:05Z")

</div>

RPM fix was made here, BTW:

[https://github.com/ansible/ansible/commit/8e54817f50d2a9587aa6507e978c496e303c656b](https://github.com/ansible/ansible/commit/8e54817f50d2a9587aa6507e978c496e303c656b)

We’ve also got a patch in for Arch.

I suspect the Debian/Ubuntu content in tree may need some too?

Thanks everyone!!!
