# Collection inclusion: vote on collections submitted for inclusion before starting the review process

**URL:** <https://forum.ansible.com/t/collection-inclusion-vote-on-collections-submitted-for-inclusion-before-starting-the-review-process/4231>\
**Category:** Project Discussions\
**Tags:** resolved, community-wg\
**Created:** [March 6, 2024, 8:54am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/collection-inclusion-vote-on-collections-submitted-for-inclusion-before-starting-the-review-process/4231 "2024-03-06T08:54:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andersson007](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/andersson007/32/89_2.png) [@Andersson007](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Andersson007)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2024, 7:06am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/collection-inclusion-vote-on-collections-submitted-for-inclusion-before-starting-the-review-process/4231/8 "2024-04-09T07:06:29Z")

</div>

Thanks, folks, for sharing the great thoughts on the topic! Really appreciated.  
All the stuff mentioned sounds fair.  
Once again feeling persuaded that keeping the true level playing field is important here.  
I’ll put the resolved tag. Later if needed, we can refer to this discussion if similar ones pop up.  
I think Galaxy rendering improvement is a great idea, so any PRs to improve it will be much appreciated.  
[Another topic](http://forum.ansible.com/t/steering-committee-update-collection-inclusion-procedure/4833) to discuss is that we should make the inclusion process more effective. Please take a look.

Thanks!

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.ansible.com/t/collection-inclusion-vote-on-collections-submitted-for-inclusion-before-starting-the-review-process/4231)._