# Bullhorn content quality improvement proposals **URL:** \ **Category:** Project Discussions\ **Tags:** cfgmgmgtcamp, community, newsletter, community-wg\ **Created:** [February 11, 2026, 3:20pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321 "2026-02-11T15:20:44Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![mariolenz](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/mariolenz/32/108_2.png) [@mariolenz](https://forum.ansible.com/u/mariolenz)\ **Post date:** [February 23, 2026, 6:01pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321/21 "2026-02-23T18:01:05Z")
Good point. So why not get rid of the link to galaxy? Like: > [community.general 12.3.0](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/stable-12/CHANGELOG.md#v12-3-0) is a regular feature and bugfix release with 70+ minor changes, six bugfixes, and one new filter module. > [community.general 11.4.4](https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general/blob/stable-11/CHANGELOG.md#v11-4-4) is a regular bugfix release. I guess that people who download the tarball directly from galaxy don’t need a direct link, they are probably savvy enough to find it themselves. _edit_: Which looks pretty close to what has been announced in [Bullhorn 217](https://forum.ansible.com/t/the-bullhorn-217/45240#p-137427-collection-updates-9). ---
**Author:** ![felixfontein](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/felixfontein/32/7530_2.png) [@felixfontein](https://forum.ansible.com/u/felixfontein)\ **Post date:** [February 23, 2026, 7:09pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321/22 "2026-02-23T19:09:20Z")
@kks suggested to link to Galaxy as well, maybe he can say why he suggested that before we decide (or not) to remove it 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![kks](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/kks/32/10352_2.png) [@kks](https://forum.ansible.com/u/kks)\ **Post date:** [February 23, 2026, 8:37pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321/23 "2026-02-23T20:37:08Z")
I’ve suggested link to galaxy to have a link to the docs. Not all collections have docs on docs.ansible. ---
**Author:** ![mariolenz](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/mariolenz/32/108_2.png) [@mariolenz](https://forum.ansible.com/u/mariolenz)\ **Post date:** [February 24, 2026, 4:17pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321/24 "2026-02-24T16:17:22Z")
@kks FYI I think the documentation on galaxy is [broken](https://forum.ansible.com/t/3496) when collections use docs fragments from another collection. Nevertheless, I think you have a valid point there. I guess it’s a good argument to link to galaxy. ---
**Author:** ![kks](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/kks/32/10352_2.png) [@kks](https://forum.ansible.com/u/kks)\ **Post date:** [February 24, 2026, 4:49pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321/25 "2026-02-24T16:49:37Z")
> [@mariolenz](#): > > I think the documentation on galaxy is [broken](https://forum.ansible.com/t/3496) …In so many ways… Could not agree more. ---
**Author:** ![mariolenz](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/mariolenz/32/108_2.png) [@mariolenz](https://forum.ansible.com/u/mariolenz)\ **Post date:** [February 24, 2026, 4:49pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321/26 "2026-02-24T16:49:51Z")
> [@mariolenz](#): > > I’m no native speaker, but “major new releases” sounds a little bit unfortunate to me. At first, I confused this with “new major releases” and than realized that this is not about _major releases_ at all. Any ideas on this? ---
**Author:** ![dbrennand](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/dbrennand/32/7830_2.png) [@dbrennand](https://forum.ansible.com/u/dbrennand)\ **Post date:** [October 5, 2026, 9:46am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321/27 "2026-10-05T09:46:24Z")
Hi @Sutapa - The configuration for the NewsBot is located here: [ansible.im/bots at main · ansible-community/ansible.im · GitHub](https://github.com/ansible-community/ansible.im/tree/main/bots) The templates which would require changes for this proposed new formatting: - [ansible.im/bots/newsbot-project.md at main · ansible-community/ansible.im · GitHub](https://github.com/ansible-community/ansible.im/blob/main/bots/newsbot-project.md) - [ansible.im/bots/newsbot-report.md at main · ansible-community/ansible.im · GitHub](https://github.com/ansible-community/ansible.im/blob/main/bots/newsbot-report.md) - [ansible.im/bots/newsbot-section.md at main · ansible-community/ansible.im · GitHub](https://github.com/ansible-community/ansible.im/blob/main/bots/newsbot-section.md) The templating engine is: [minijinja - Rust](https://docs.rs/minijinja/latest/minijinja/) ---
**Author:** ![dbrennand](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/dbrennand/32/7830_2.png) [@dbrennand](https://forum.ansible.com/u/dbrennand)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 7:52am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321/28 "2026-10-23T07:52:27Z")
Hi again, some bits have moved around this week: [GitHub - ansible-community/newsbot: Configuration, newsletter template, and container image for the Ansible Community Newsbot. · GitHub](https://github.com/ansible-community/newsbot) - All the config is located here now. [Previous page](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bullhorn-content-quality-improvement-proposals/45321.md?page=1)