# Bountysource ownership

**URL:** <https://forum.ansible.com/t/bountysource-ownership/18488>\
**Category:** Ansible Project\
**Created:** [June 12, 2015, 9:21pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bountysource-ownership/18488 "2015-06-12T21:21:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_Paine](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/858c86/32.png) [@Tom\_Paine](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Tom_Paine)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2015, 9:21pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bountysource-ownership/18488/1 "2015-06-12T21:21:34Z")

</div>

Has anyone on the Ansible team thought about claiming their [Bountysource page](https://www.bountysource.com/teams/ansible/settings) to encourage bug and feature PRs?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Greg\_DeKoenigsberg1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/838e76/32.png) [@Greg\_DeKoenigsberg1](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Greg_DeKoenigsberg1)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2015, 10:08pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/bountysource-ownership/18488/2 "2015-06-12T22:08:38Z")

</div>

Currently, our biggest problem isn't bug and feature PRs -- we've  
already got hundreds in the pipe. Our issue is our ability to review  
them. First priority, in process, is to improve that process. Once  
we've done that, we might consider something like Bountysource.

--g
