# Allow our forum gardeners to mark solutions?

**URL:** <https://forum.ansible.com/t/allow-our-forum-gardeners-to-mark-solutions/2955>\
**Category:** Forum Guide & Feedback\
**Created:** [December 18, 2023, 9:43am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/allow-our-forum-gardeners-to-mark-solutions/2955 "2023-12-18T09:43:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chris](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/ansible/user_avatar/forum.ansible.com/chris/32/293_2.png) [@chris](https://forum.ansible.com/u/chris)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2024, 2:45pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/allow-our-forum-gardeners-to-mark-solutions/2955/9 "2024-11-15T14:45:49Z")

</div>

Incidently I just discovered that Trust Level upgrades in Discourse is not a one-way thing — users can be automatically downgraded, I believe this has happened to me, it doesn’t matter, but I’m glad it was probably done automatically and not manually 😉 .

> **[Feature request: show TL3 requirements to people that have reached TL3 in the...](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-request-show-tl3-requirements-to-people-that-have-reached-tl3-in-the-past/315329)**
>
> What I’m referring to is this page I understand why it might be a undesirable thing to show someone the TL3 requirements - because they can just do the bare minimum inorganically to race to complete the requirements. But a reoccurring issue...

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.ansible.com/t/allow-our-forum-gardeners-to-mark-solutions/2955)._
