# acl module improvements

**URL:** <https://forum.ansible.com/t/acl-module-improvements/14546>\
**Category:** Ansible Developer\
**Created:** [February 11, 2014, 11:33pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/acl-module-improvements/14546 "2014-02-11T23:33:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brian\_Coca1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@Brian\_Coca1](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Brian_Coca1)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2014, 11:33pm UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/acl-module-improvements/14546/1 "2014-02-11T23:33:37Z")

</div>

I had a discussion start on my ansible forked repo as a PR, I think this might be of interest to more so I’m moving the discussion here.

Linking this as a reference, please do not post on it (#githubwhishlist):  
[https://github.com/bcoca/ansible/pull/1](https://github.com/bcoca/ansible/pull/1)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael\_DeHaan1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/5e9695/32.png) [@Michael\_DeHaan1](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Michael_DeHaan1)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2014, 1:19am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/acl-module-improvements/14546/2 "2014-02-12T01:19:49Z")

</div>

Thanks!

So my mind is slightly brain damaged presently which is my fault, so my reading comprehension may not be super great 🙂

Are we anticipating any syntax changes that might not be backward compatible?

I’m having a bit of trouble in deciding whether we need to help make a call toward preference on something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brian\_Coca1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@Brian\_Coca1](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Brian_Coca1)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2014, 1:30am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/acl-module-improvements/14546/3 "2014-02-12T01:30:54Z")

</div>

I made a new/better/closer to actual ACL syntax, but kept the one i created for the first version of this module (I was the brain damaged one then) to keep backward compatibility, both ways should work, old playbooks can continue unchanged.
