# 0.4 release status (question)

**URL:** <https://forum.ansible.com/t/0-4-release-status-question/11554>\
**Category:** Ansible Project\
**Created:** [May 17, 2012, 11:12am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/0-4-release-status-question/11554 "2012-05-17T11:12:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael\_DeHaan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c4cdca/32.png) [@Michael\_DeHaan](https://forum.ansible.com/u/Michael_DeHaan)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2012, 11:12am UTC](https://forum.ansible.com/t/0-4-release-status-question/11554/1 "2012-05-17T11:12:00Z")

</div>

So,

There are only two bugs I would consider POSSIBLY blocking 0.4.

(A) Multiple groups appear to not work correctly with the INI format file (not sure about YAML format, but needs testing).

[https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/395](https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/395)

(B) The way hosts are referenced, it is impossible to have two hosts on the same port, which runs afoul of tunneling.

Seeing I don’t think (B) ever worked, I am fine with fixing (B) early in 0.5 – patches welcome.

(A) is probably a bit more important to fix. If anyone wants to try their hand at fixing (A), it will speed up the release somewhat. Otherwise, I may not have time to address it until next week.  
This still puts us ahead of the original schedule.

Again, hint hint: [https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/395](https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/395)

Issues with --connection=local should be resolved this AM.

I would assume lots of folks have been testing the devel branch, and the bug count is pretty low, so I think the release is still in great shape and can go out after we resolve #395.

–Michael